Table 2

Correlation analysis and limits of agreement (Bland-Altman analysis) between the echocardiographic methods based upon the experience of the readers.


Expert (n = 5)

Novice (n = 2)

Expert (n = 1)


Limits of agreement
r
Limits of agreement
r
Limits of agreement
r

LVEF (%):







cAutoEF vs BS expert
1.4 ± 9.0
0.89
0.8 ± 10.5
0.85


AutoEF vs BS expert




2.2 ± 12.1
0.81
BS novice vs BS expert


-3.2 ± 11.4
0.81


cAutoEF novice vs expert


-0.6 ± 5.5
0.96



EDV/BSA (mL/cm2):







cAutoEF vs BS expert
-3.3 ± 13.0
0.94
-2.3 ± 13.1
0.94


AutoEF vs BS expert




-5.8 ± 14.4
0.86
BS novice vs BS expert


18.8 ± 22.1
0.87


cAutoEF novice vs expert


1.0 ± 5.1
0.99



ESV/BSA (mL/cm2):







cAutoEF vs BS expert
-2.6 ± 7.8
0.97
-1.8 ± 8.0
0.97


AutoEF vs BS expert




-4.3 ± 9.3
0.95
BS novice vs BS expert


12.1 ± 12.4
0.93


cAutoEF novice vs expert


0.8 ± 3.5
0.99



Limit of agreement is calculated as bias ± 1.96

SD BS = manual biplane Simpson, BSA = body surface area, cAutoEF = corrected AutoEF, EDV = End-diastolic volume, ESV = End-systolic volume, LVEF = Left ventricular ejection fraction

Maret et al. Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2008 6:55   doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-55