Cardiovascular Ultrasound
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchArterial pressure changes monitoring with a new precordial noninvasive sensorTonino Bombardini1 , Vincenzo Gemignani2 , Elisabetta Bianchini2 , Lucia Venneri1 , Christina Petersen1 , Emilio Pasanisi1 , Lorenza Pratali1 , Mascia Pianelli1 , Francesco Faita2 , Massimo Giannoni2 , Giorgio Arpesella3 and Eugenio Picano3  1
Department of Echocardiography Lab, Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy 2
Digital Signal Processing Lab (DSPLAB), Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy 3
Department of Surgery and Transplants, University of Bologna, Italy author email corresponding author email
Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2008,
6:41doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-41
|
| Published: |
21 August 2008 |
Abstract
Background
Recently, a cutaneous force-frequency relation recording system based on first heart sound amplitude vibrations has been validated. A further application is the assessment of Second Heart Sound (S2) amplitude variations at increasing heart rates. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between second heart sound amplitude variations at increasing heart rates and hemodynamic changes.
Methods
The transcutaneous force sensor was positioned in the precordial region in 146 consecutive patients referred for exercise (n = 99), dipyridamole (n = 41), or pacing stress (n = 6). The curve of S2 peak amplitude variation as a function of heart rate was computed as the increment with respect to the resting value.
Results
A consistent S2 signal was obtained in all patients. Baseline S2 was 7.2 ± 3.3 mg, increasing to 12.7 ± 7.7 mg at peak stress. S2 percentage increase was + 133 ± 104% in the 99 exercise, + 2 ± 22% in the 41 dipyridamole, and + 31 ± 27% in the 6 pacing patients (p < 0.05). Significant determinants of S2 amplitude were blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index with best correlation (R = .57) for mean pressure.
Conclusion
S2 recording quantitatively documents systemic pressure changes. |