Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Open AccessResearch

Arterial pressure changes monitoring with a new precordial noninvasive sensor

Tonino Bombardini1 email, Vincenzo Gemignani2 email, Elisabetta Bianchini2 email, Lucia Venneri1 email, Christina Petersen1 email, Emilio Pasanisi1 email, Lorenza Pratali1 email, Mascia Pianelli1 email, Francesco Faita2 email, Massimo Giannoni2 email, Giorgio Arpesella3 email and Eugenio Picano3 email

Department of Echocardiography Lab, Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy

Digital Signal Processing Lab (DSPLAB), Fondazione Gabriele Monasterio, Italian National Research Council, Pisa, Italy

Department of Surgery and Transplants, University of Bologna, Italy

author email corresponding author email

Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2008, 6:41doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-41

Published: 21 August 2008

Abstract

Background

Recently, a cutaneous force-frequency relation recording system based on first heart sound amplitude vibrations has been validated. A further application is the assessment of Second Heart Sound (S2) amplitude variations at increasing heart rates. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between second heart sound amplitude variations at increasing heart rates and hemodynamic changes.

Methods

The transcutaneous force sensor was positioned in the precordial region in 146 consecutive patients referred for exercise (n = 99), dipyridamole (n = 41), or pacing stress (n = 6). The curve of S2 peak amplitude variation as a function of heart rate was computed as the increment with respect to the resting value.

Results

A consistent S2 signal was obtained in all patients. Baseline S2 was 7.2 ± 3.3 mg, increasing to 12.7 ± 7.7 mg at peak stress. S2 percentage increase was + 133 ± 104% in the 99 exercise, + 2 ± 22% in the 41 dipyridamole, and + 31 ± 27% in the 6 pacing patients (p < 0.05). Significant determinants of S2 amplitude were blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index with best correlation (R = .57) for mean pressure.

Conclusion

S2 recording quantitatively documents systemic pressure changes.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.