Cardiovascular Ultrasound
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
ResearchAssessment of left ventricular volumes using simplified 3-D echocardiography and computed tomography – a phantom and clinical studyMattias Mårtensson1 , Reidar Winter2 , Kerstin Cederlund3 , Jonaz Ripsweden3 , Habib Mir-Akbari4 , Jacek Nowak2 and Lars-Åke Brodin1  1
School for Technology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Flemingsberg, Stockholm, Sweden 2
Department of Clinical Physiology, Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden 3
Department of Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden 4
Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital in Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden author email corresponding author email
Cardiovascular Ultrasound 2008,
6:26doi:10.1186/1476-7120-6-26 Abstract
Objectives
To compare the accuracy of simplified 3-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography vs. multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) software for the quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes.
Design
Three-D echocardiography (3-planes approach) and MSCT-CardIQ software were calibrated by measuring known volumes of 10 phantoms designed to closely mimic blood-endocardium interface. Subsequently, LV volumes were measured with both the methods in 9 patients referred routinely for coronary angiography and the agreement between the measurements was evaluated.
Results
Simplified 3D-echocardiography provided higher degree of agreement between the measured and true phantom volumes (mean difference 0 ± 1 ml, variation range +4 to -4 ml) than MSCT software (mean difference 6 ± 5 ml; variation range +22 to -10 ml). The agreement between LV measurements in the patients was considerably poorer, with significantly larger volumes produced by MSCT (mean difference -23 ± 40 ml, variation between +93 and -138 ml).
Conclusion
Simplified 3-D echocardiography provides more accurate assessment of phantom volumes than MSCT-CardIQ software. The discrepancy between the results of LV measurements with the two methods is even greater and does not warrant their interchangeable diagnostic use. |